Comments on: RFacebook to see some updates and code slimming http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27 my reflections on stuff Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:02:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: NetManiac http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-7325 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:29:42 +0000 http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-7325 I did some very basic support for photos.upload for RFacebook. It is very simple and I want to get some feedback from You if this is right direction for adding support to photos upload. More details on my blog: http://nhw.pl/wp/2008/06/13/uploading-photos-to-facebook-with-rfacebook I did some very basic support for photos.upload for RFacebook. It is very simple and I want to get some feedback from You if this is right direction for adding support to photos upload.

More details on my blog:
http://nhw.pl/wp/2008/06/13/uploading-photos-to-facebook-with-rfacebook

]]> by: sudara http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1773 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:17:33 +0000 http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1773 I think that out of the box compatibility with rails 2 would be great. It means folks can actually use rfacebook again without patching and/or tearing their hair out. I look forward to working with the new version! I think that out of the box compatibility with rails 2 would be great. It means folks can actually use rfacebook again without patching and/or tearing their hair out.

I look forward to working with the new version!

]]> by: Jen Nolan http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1771 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:44:21 +0000 http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1771 I agree that getting Ruby objects back would be a nice improvement (maybe make this an option so is backward compatible). I would also like to see support for the Photos.upload API (special format requirements compared to other API calls). http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Photos.upload Thanks for the great work Jen I agree that getting Ruby objects back would be a nice improvement (maybe make this an option so is backward compatible).

I would also like to see support for the Photos.upload API (special format requirements compared to other API calls).
http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Photos.upload

Thanks for the great work
Jen

]]> by: Ben Nevile http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1724 Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:51:34 +0000 http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1724 Hi - I'd like to contribute to the codebase. I have been developing acts_as_facebook_page to go along with acts_as_facebook_user. Ben Hi - I’d like to contribute to the codebase. I have been developing acts_as_facebook_page to go along with acts_as_facebook_user.

Ben

]]> by: Steve E. http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1702 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:09:27 +0000 http://www.livelearncode.com/archives/27#comment-1702 Good to see you back! x=) A couple of things that would be great to see in the 1.0 release would be support for the new fb_sig_request_method that would allow rails to know what kind of request is being sent and act acordingly, giving us REST support back. Another idea i had was to ween out the facepricot (or possibly make it a non-default option) and return results in normal ruby objects like hash's and array's.. not sure how well this would work. Otherwise, great gem/plugin already and I look forward to any improvements you throw at me. x=) Good to see you back! x=) A couple of things that would be great to see in the 1.0 release would be support for the new fb_sig_request_method that would allow rails to know what kind of request is being sent and act acordingly, giving us REST support back. Another idea i had was to ween out the facepricot (or possibly make it a non-default option) and return results in normal ruby objects like hash’s and array’s.. not sure how well this would work. Otherwise, great gem/plugin already and I look forward to any improvements you throw at me. x=)

]]>